Two unchecked items from the README status list that were buildable in-repo rather than blocked on hardware. hosts/llm-host/ — Phase 3's LLM machine: - Auto-detects gpu vs cpu tier (nvidia-smi must both exist AND succeed; a leftover driver package on a machine whose card was pulled satisfies only the first and would fail later at container start). - Runs Ollama as a pinned container rather than curl|sh into a root shell, matching how everything else here is deployed. Deliberately does NOT install the GPU driver — the most hardware/kernel-specific step on that box. - Sets OLLAMA_HOST=0.0.0.0 inside the container. Ollama binds loopback by default, which in Docker means the published port forwards to nothing and every caller sees a connection refused indistinguishable from "the host is off" — and since every consumer here is built to tolerate exactly that, it degrades silently. Same class of bug as chores' 127.0.0.1 env values. - Takes a position on Ollama contention (open decision #4's resource half): MAX_LOADED_MODELS=1 so a 14B text model and a vision model swap predictably instead of thrashing VRAM or OOM-ing mid-request, NUM_PARALLEL=1 for predictable Assist latency, KEEP_ALIVE=30m so a household that talks to Assist a few times an hour isn't paying model-load cost every time. - Documents that Ollama has NO authentication and its API can delete models, not just generate — added to network-integration.md's port table, since the network is the entire boundary. docs/caldav-integration.md — Phase 8's notes: - The four independent clients and their directions (digest-engine read-only, chores' busy-check read-only, trash-calendar create-only under a UID-prefix ownership invariant, HA's own bridge). - Why they share one Nextcloud app password, and the two costs: rotation touches three env files plus HA and fails quietly, and the read-only invariant is a CODE property, not a permission boundary — an app password can't be scoped read-only or per-calendar, so the server would not catch a regression that started writing. - The two traps worth knowing before debugging them: unexpanded recurrence reporting a meeting on the day it was created, and CALDAV_VERIFY_TLS=false. Neither has been run — no Debian machine, no GPU, no live Nextcloud. The script is syntax-checked and its generated compose validated as YAML for both tiers; that is the whole of the testing, and both READMEs say so. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| scripts | ||
| README.md | ||
README.md
llm-host
The Ollama machine, from Phase 3 of the project plan. A separate physical host from the container host, on purpose — see "Why a separate machine" below.
Everything in this project that wants inference calls this one server:
| Caller | What it asks for | If this host is off |
|---|---|---|
| Home Assistant (Assist / AI Task) | Conversation, tool calls, Phase 4's brightness/colour JSON | Assist's LLM agent is unavailable; presence → light still works, on plain automations |
digest-engine |
Quarter-daily synthesis + the counter-run verification pass | The run is skipped; the timer doesn't error |
pantry-vision |
Grocery-item recognition from one photo | The scan flow reports it can't identify; Grocy is untouched |
chores |
Bin/dishes/litter vision checks, and reminder phrasing | Camera checks skip; nudges use the plain template |
The guardrail this host is built around
Every consumer must degrade to "unavailable", never to "broken", when this machine is off. The project plan's testing checklist states it directly — "Does the reactive path (presence → light on) work with the LLM host powered off? (It must.)"
That's the whole reason this is a separate box rather than more containers on the Phase 1 host: it can be off — for power, for noise, because you pulled the GPU — and the house still works. The setup script's closing output walks you through actually testing that, and it's worth doing once for real rather than assuming.
If something breaks rather than degrading when this host is down, that's a bug in the consumer, not here.
Two tiers
Auto-detected from whether nvidia-smi both exists and succeeds (a leftover driver
package on a machine whose card was pulled satisfies the first but not the second).
Override with TIER at the top of the script.
| Tier | Model | Reality |
|---|---|---|
gpu |
qwen2.5:14b-instruct |
What Phase 3 specifies |
cpu |
qwen2.5:7b-instruct |
Single-digit tokens/sec. Enough to validate the entire pipeline end to end before buying a card — docs/components.md's deliberate "skip GPU" fallback, not a failure mode |
Plus a vision model (llava by default) for pantry-vision and chores. Set
PULL_VISION_MODEL=false to skip it and save several GB if you're not running those
camera paths yet.
The vision model choice is not a considered one. llava is simply the default
those two services already ship with, and open decision #18 flags the pick as unmade
and completely unbenchmarked. If grocery recognition turns out too slow or too
inaccurate to be usable, this is the first knob to turn — qwen2.5vl and moondream
are the obvious alternatives to measure against.
Contention: interactive vs. batch on one GPU
The real scheduling problem here (project plan open decision #4), and the script's defaults take a position on it:
- Assist is interactive — a person is standing in the room waiting.
digest-engineis batch — every 6h, nobody watching.- The vision callers are occasional but want a different model resident.
| Setting | Default | Why |
|---|---|---|
OLLAMA_KEEP_ALIVE |
30m |
Ollama's own default of 5m means a household that talks to Assist a few times an hour pays the model-load cost nearly every time. 30m keeps it warm through normal use |
OLLAMA_MAX_LOADED_MODELS |
1 |
Deliberate. A 14B text model and a vision model don't co-fit in 8–12GB; letting Ollama try produces VRAM thrash or an OOM mid-request instead of an honest swap. 1 means "swap predictably, pay the reload when vision is actually needed." Raise it only if you have the VRAM and have checked |
OLLAMA_NUM_PARALLEL |
1 |
Predictable latency for whoever is speaking, over throughput nothing here needs |
This is a reasoned default, not a measured one — none of it has been run against a
real GPU under real concurrent load. The remaining half of open decision #4 (whether
DIGEST_SCHEDULE's 00,06,12,18 overlaps real Assist usage) needs actual usage data
to settle; the settings above at least make the failure mode a predictable swap rather
than an OOM.
Security: Ollama has no authentication
None. Not a token, not a password. And its API is not read-only — it can pull and
delete models, not just generate. Anyone who can reach :11434 can do all of that.
The network is therefore the entire boundary: keep this host on the smart-home VLAN
and never port-forward it, exactly as docs/network-integration.md §1 says for
everything else. It's now in that document's port table for the same reason.
Why a container, not the native installer
Ollama's official install is curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh, which
pipes a fetched script straight into a root shell. The container path gives a pinned
image, an uninstall that's docker rm, and no arbitrary remote code executed as root
— the same reasoning behind every other component in this project running in Docker.
The native install is a perfectly legitimate alternative, and on some GPU setups it's
less fuss than the NVIDIA Container Toolkit. If you go that way, the one thing you
must still do is set OLLAMA_HOST=0.0.0.0:11434 in the systemd unit — see below.
The one configuration mistake that looks like a dead host
Ollama binds 127.0.0.1 by default. In a container, that means the published port
forwards to a socket nothing is listening on, and every caller gets a connection
refused that is indistinguishable from "the LLM host is powered off" — which, given
that every consumer here is built to tolerate exactly that, degrades silently and
looks like nothing is wrong.
The compose file sets OLLAMA_HOST=0.0.0.0:11434 for this reason. Check it first if
inference is mysteriously "unavailable" everywhere at once. (This is the same class of
bug as chores' env template pointing at 127.0.0.1 for a sibling container — see
the project plan's open decision #38.)
Run it
cd hosts/llm-host/scripts
sudo ./setup-llm-host.sh
Edit the variables at the top first — BASE_DIR above all, since models are large
(a 14B Q4 model is ~9GB, a vision model another 5–8GB) and it defaults to
/opt/llm-host.
For the GPU tier, the NVIDIA driver must already work (nvidia-smi prints your
card). The script installs the Container Toolkit that lets Docker see the GPU, but
deliberately does not install the driver: that's the most hardware- and
kernel-specific step on this machine, and silently choosing a driver version for
someone is a good way to produce a box that doesn't boot.
Afterwards the script prints exactly what to paste into HA and into each service's env file on the container host.
Manual verification still outstanding
- None of this has been run. No Debian machine, no GPU, no Ollama server — the script is syntax-checked and its generated compose file is validated as YAML for both tiers, and that is the entire extent of the testing. Same honesty rule as every other unbuilt host in this repo.
- The model tags are library names that upstream does rename.
qwen2.5:14b-instructandllavaare written from Ollama's library as documented, not confirmed pullable today. A failed pull is deliberately non-fatal — the server stays up and you fix the tag by hand — but check https://ollama.com/library if one fails. - The NVIDIA Container Toolkit repo/apt steps are from NVIDIA's documented install,
not run on a real machine.
nvidia-ctk runtime configure --runtime=dockerfollowed by a Docker restart is the documented shape; verify against NVIDIA's current docs before trusting it on hardware you care about. - The contention defaults are unmeasured — see the table above.
- Whether a 14B model at Q4 actually fits your card is not checked anywhere. On 8GB it will be tight-to-impossible; on 12GB+ it's comfortable. If it OOMs, drop to the CPU tier's 7B tag on the GPU, which is the cheap first thing to try.
- No Wake-on-LAN. If you want the digest timer to wake this host rather than skip
its run, that's a BIOS +
ethtool -s <iface> wol g+ awakeonlancall from the container host's timer — deliberately not scripted here, since it depends on hardware that hasn't been chosen.